Human Collective Agreement Definition

Collective bargaining is a negotiation process between employers and a group of workers that aims to conclude agreements to regulate wages, working conditions, benefits and other aspects of workers` compensation and rights for workers. Workers` interests are usually represented by representatives of a trade union to which the workers belong. Collective agreements obtained through these negotiations generally set wage scales, working hours, training, health and safety, overtime, complaint mechanisms and the right to participate in labour or company affairs. [1] Only one in three OECD employees has wages agreed by collective bargaining. The 36-member Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has become a strong supporter of collective bargaining to ensure that falling unemployment also leads to higher wages. [17] The magnitude of BC requires separate treatment, as it is more difficult to determine than it appears. Such coverage is not linked to union membership, as a contract likely covers all workers in a given unit, whether they are members of the union that negotiated it or not. However, in Britain and the United States, it is quite clear who is covered by a collective agreement. America, in particular, uses the language of “released” and “unde released” employees (introduced by the Fair Labor Standards Act 1938), but the former (general managers and supervisors) are not covered by CB. If there is a collective agreement, the sites concerned and the staff concerned are clearly defined. In some other countries, the situation is also clear. In countries like Sweden, where union membership is very high and has many groups of employees who could be considered exempt in the United States, coverage is also extremely high.

But in France, for example, a collective agreement is less clearly defined. Many French trade unions formally refused to sign contracts, as this was contrary to communist ideology; they were covered in practice, even if they were not signatories. Similarly, we know that French trade union membership is a poor indication of workers` trade union membership. France is, in addition to Germany, a case where collective agreements are generally extended to an entire sector to cover undertakings and workers not directly involved (Traxler 1996). It is important to note that once a KNA is reached, both the employer and the union are required to abide by this agreement. Therefore, an employer should hire a lawyer before participating in the collective bargaining process. The provisions on equal pay for equivalent (comparable) work open up a wider scope for challenge, but this strategy has proved difficult to implement. Historical biases in the way “female” jobs are evaluated have not been easy to eliminate, as even fairly detailed job evaluation methods can maintain aspects of gender bias and effectively maintain existing hierarchies (Steinberg, 1992). In addition, the cases turned out to be complex and time-taking. However, the comparable value allows for a revision of the work evaluation and is particularly important given the clear opposition of occupational segregation patterns to change. It will be most effective if there is a wide margin of comparison and the results apply collectively to types of jobs and not to individuals. Comparing Table 4.2 with Table 4.1 provides an approximate overview of changes since 1990.

In the public sector, it seems that there has been a decisive movement of companies and workers in registered collective agreements. In the private sector, change seems less dramatic and more fragmented. The distinctions remain important, especially in sectors such as hospitality and retail, which have a large number of women, often poorly paid. Where there is an abandonment of public procurement in the private sector, there has been both movement in the less regulated area of unregistered individual contracts and movement in registered collective agreements. . . .

Dit bericht is gepost in Geen categorie. Bookmark de link.