In the prefatorium of this law, it says: “RUUNAA was designed with small informal associations in mind. These informal organizations probably do not have legal advice and therefore do not take into account legal and organizational issues, including their integration. The law offers better answers than the common law for a limited number of legal problems. There are probably hundreds of thousands of UNAS in the United States, including non-profit philanthropic, educational, scientific, and literary clubs, sports organizations, unions, trade associations, political organizations, churches, hospitals, condominium and neighborhood associations. “Revised Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Associations Act, www.abanet.org/intlaw/leadership/policy/RUUNAA_Final_08.pdf. At least twelve States have taken over RUUNAA or its predecessor. Under neither law, a partner can unilaterally dispose of ownership of the partnership, whatever it may be, for the obvious reason that one cannot dispose of the ownership or property rights of another without authorization. UPA, §9, paragraph 3, point a, and Article 25; RUPA, Section 302. And remember that the right of partnership is the norm: partners can issue partnership agreements to Beher or Beherbig, subject to certain restrictions. They are free to establish rules of ownership based on origin. (a) When a partnership responsibility arises, he is liable as if he were actually a member of the company. Whitehead then filed a partial summary judgment application, claiming that Loomis and Shanahan`s failure to register their fictitious partnership with the District Officer prevented them from taking legal action under NRS 602.070.